mxAURA™Help

Evidence: proof the drafts can cite

Evidence under Hubs holds the claims your drafts may stand on. Proof as claims, not pages: each one is a single statement, the words on a page it rests on, and the page it came from.

Where the claims come from

What a claim carries

Approve, reject, name

Nothing reaches a draft until you approve it. Rejected claims are not offered again when the source is read again; neither are approved ones, which stay as they are.

A named customer stays unnamed in every draft until you tick May be named. Tick it only when the customer has agreed. Until then the drafts see "a customer" in its place.

Where approved claims go

An article you write is not proof of your own claim. It is how proof gets to the reader. Proof that only a customer can give cannot be written into existence; ask the customer.

What adds the most next

At the top of Evidence, Suggest reads your approved claims against your positioning and lists the three pieces of work that add the most credibility now.

Credibility is proof times perspective. Evidence proves results; perspective proves judgment; a pillar with one and not the other is weaker than it looks. So when proof is thin the suggestions lean to proof, and when you have proof but no stated position they lean to a position. Nobody asks you to choose. Each suggestion says why it is next, ranked by what it adds on the pillars your live campaigns write on, and a batch is never all one kind.

An article you write is not proof of your own claim, so no suggestion is a piece that only praises. The drafts flag the thought-leadership register ("the future of", "paradigm shift") so it can be edited out.

All topics